Percina sipsi, Bankhead darter

Percina sipsi Williams & Neely, 2007

Bankhead darter
Carregue seu(sua) Fotos e vídeos
Imagem do Google
Image of Percina sipsi (Bankhead darter)
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Percidae.

Classificação / Nomes Nomes comuns | Sinônimos | Catalog of Fishes(Gênero, Espécies) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

> Perciformes/Percoidei (Perchs) > Percidae (Perches) > Etheostomatinae
Etymology: Percina: Latin, diminutive of perch = perch (Ref. 45335)sipsi: The specific name, sipsi, is the Chickasaw-Choctaw Indian name for poplar or cottonwood tree, and is the origin of “Sipsey” in the stream name, Sipsey Fork of the Black Warrior River (Foscue 1989), to which this species is endemic. The common name,.

Meio ambiente: milieu / Zona climática / intervalo de profundidade / faixa de distribuição Ecologia

; Água doce bentopelágico; intervalo de profundidade 0 - 2 m (Ref. 58738). Temperate; 35°N - 33°N, 88°W - 86°W

Distribuição Territórios | Áreas da FAO | Ecossistemas | Ocorrências | Mapa de pontos | Introduções | Faunafri

North America: United States of America. Percina sipsi is known only from the Sipsey Fork of the Black Warrior River in the Bankhead National Forest in northwestern Alabama. It occurs in Borden Creek in Lawrence County, and Brushy Creek, Caney Creek, and Sipsey Fork (recorded as West Fork Sipsey River on some maps) in Winston County. While the current known range of P. sipsi is very limited and confined downstream by Lewis Smith Reservoir, historically it is possible that the species ranged farther downstream in the Sipsey Fork and conceivably in the Locust and Mulberry forks of the Black Warrior River, which are all located in the Cumberland Plateau physiographic province. Riverine habitat in the lower reaches of the Sipsey Fork was destroyed in 1960 by the Alabama Power Company impoundment behind Lewis Smith Dam. The current distribution of P. sipsi represents the most restricted range of any known species of Percina (Ref. 58738).

Tamanho / Peso / Idade

Maturidade: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 5.0 cm SL macho/indeterminado; (Ref. 58738)

Descrição suscinta Chaves de identificação | Morfologia | Morfometria

Percina sipsi is one of the two smallest species in the genus Percina, rarely exceeding 50 mm SL (P. brevicauda, maximum SL is 50 mm, see Suttkus et al. 1994). Percina sipsi is distinguished from all other described species of Percina by a combination of the following characteristics: absence of bright colors on body and fins of adults; no orange band in spinous dorsal fin; no broad vertical bands on body extending dorsally across the back joining those of the other side; 7–11 lateral blotches fused into continuous dark brown to black lateral stripe with undulating margins; lateral stripe continuous with large, somewhat quadrate basicaudal blotch that extends onto base of caudal fin rays; small, dark blotch on upper and lower portion of caudal fin base, dorsal blotch typically darker; body below lateral stripe white to cream colored, without dark blotches, becoming dusky in breeding males; suborbital bar absent or very poorly developed; lateral line complete, typically no pored scales on base of caudal fin; males with row of modified scales on midline of belly and one or two modified scales between base of pelvic fins;modified breast scale absent; nuptial tubercles absent; anal fin of breeding males not excessively elongate; males without caudal keel as a ventral extension of the caudal peduncle; snout does not project beyond anterior margin of upper jaw; broad premaxillary frenum present; serrae on margin of preopercle absent; branchiostegal membranes very narrowly joined to overlapping (Ref. 58738).
Body shape (shape guide): elongated.

Biologia     Glossário (p.ex. epibenthic)

Ramsey (1976) published the first conservation status review of Percina sipsi and reported it to be a threatened species. Although the assigned conservation status category has varied in subsequent evaluations (Deacon et al. 1979; Ramsey 1984; Williams et al. 1989; Warren et al. 2000), all authors considered the Bankhead Darter’s continued existence to be in a precarious situation. In the most recent assessment of conservation status of Alabama wildlife, Kuhajda (2004) reported it as a species of highest conservation concern. The entire range of this species is in the Bankhead National Forest, providing some level of protection. the authors consider P. sipsi to be highly endangered based on its restricted distribution, rarity within the occupied range, habitat vulnerability, and absence of downstream habitat for future recovery. Percina sipsi is extremely vulnerable and needs continuous monitoring and proactive management actions to prevent extinction (Ref. 58738). Migratory behaviour is undetermined (Ref. 126106).

Ciclo de vida ou comportamento de acasalamento Maturidade | Reprodução | Desova | Ovos | Fecundidade | Larvas

Referência principal Carregar suas referências | Referências | Coordenador | Colaboradores

Williams, J.D., D.A. Neely, S.J. Walsh and N.M. Burkhead, 2007. Three new percid fishes (Percidae: Percina) from the Mobile Basin drainage ofAlabama, Georgia, and Tennessee. Zootaxa 1549:1-28. (Ref. 58738)

Status na Lista Vermelha da UICN (Ref. 130435: Version 2025-2 (Global))

  Vulnerável (VU) (D2); Date assessed: 10 April 2012

CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

Ameaça para os humanos

  Harmless





Uso pelos humanos

FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

Mais informação

Ecologia Trófica
Itens alimentares (presas)
Composição da dieta
Consumo alimentar
Rações alimentares
Predadores
Ecologia
Ecologia
Dinâmica populacional
Parâmetros de crescimento
Idade máxima / tamanhos
Relação comprimento-peso.
Relação comprimento-comprimento.
Frequências de comprimento
Conversão de massa
Recrutamento
Abundância
Ciclo de vida
Reprodução
Maturidade
Maturidade/Rel. das guelras
Fecundidade
Desova
Agregações de desova
Ovos
Desenvolvimento dos ovos
Larvas
Dinâmica larval
Distribuição
Territórios
Áreas da FAO
Ecossistemas
Ocorrências
Introduções
BRUVS - Vídeos
Anatomia
Área branquial
Cérebro
Otólito
Fisiologia
Composição corporal
Nutrientes
Consumo de oxigênio
Tipo de natação
Velocidade de natação
Pigmentos visuais
Som de peixe
Doenças e Parasitas
Toxicidade (LC50s)
Genética
genoma
Genética
Heterozigosidade
Hereditariedade
Diversidade genética
Relacionado a humanos
Sistemas de aquicultura
Perfis para aquacultura
Estirpes
Casos de Ciguatera
Selos, moedas, diversos.
Divulgação
Colaboradores
Referências
Referências

Ferramentas

Relatórios especiais

Baixar XML

Fontes da internet

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | Websites from users | Checar Observador de Peixes (FishWatcher) | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: Gênero, Espécies | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | OneZoom | Open Tree of Life | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | TreeBase | Árvore da vida | Wikipedia: Ir para, procura | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | Registro zoológico

Estimativas baseadas em modelos

Índice de diversidade filogenética
(Ref. 82804)
PD50 = 0.5000 [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Bayesian length-weight a=0.00575 (0.00270 - 0.01228), b=3.13 (2.95 - 3.31), in cm total length, based on LWR estimates for this (Sub)family-body shape (Ref. 93245).
Nível Trófico
(Ref. 69278)
3.2   ±0.4 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
Resiliência
(Ref. 120179)
Elevada, tempo mínimo de duplicação da população menor que 15 meses (Preliminary K or Fecundity.).
Vulnerabilidade da pesca
(Ref. 59153)
Low vulnerability (13 of 100). 🛈