Distichodus mbiniensis

Distichodus mbiniensis Schmidt, Knobloch & Barrientos, 2021

Envoyez vos Photos et vidéos
Images Google
Image of Distichodus mbiniensis
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Distichodontidae.

Classification / Noms Noms communs | Synonymes | Catalog of Fishes(Genre, Espèce) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

> Characiformes (Characins) > Distichodontidae (Distichodus)
Etymology: Distichodus: Greek, di = two + Greek, stix, stichos = line, row (Ref. 45335)mbiniensis: The specific epithet refers to the Mbini River which is the Ndowe name for the Rio Wele; the Ndowe are Bantu-speaking people that live along the coastal region in Equatorial Guinea (Ref. 127217).

Environnement : milieu / zone climatique / profondeur / gamme de distribution Écologie

; eau douce benthopélagique. Tropical

Distribution Territoires | Zones FAO | Écosystèmes | Occurrences | Carte par point | Introductions | Faunafri

Africa: upper Mbini River drainage in Equatorial Guinea (Ref. 127217), but may also occur within this drainage in Gabon (Ref. 127217).

Taille / Poids / Âge

Maturité: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 12.2 cm SL mâle / non sexé; (Ref. 127217)

Description synthétique Clés d'identification | Morphologie | Morphométrie

Épines dorsales (Total) : 0; Rayons mous dorsaux (Total) : 16 - 18; Épines anales: 0; Rayons mous anaux: 13 - 14. Diagnosis: Distichodus mbiniensis is readily distinguished from the larger-bodied, higher-scale count Distichodus species (D. antonii, D. atroventralis, D. fasciolatus, D. lusosso, D. mossambicus, D. sexfasciatus, D. langi, D. rostratus, D. engycephalus, D. kasaiensis, D. ingae, D. polli, D. petersii, D. nefasch, D. brevipinnis and D. schenga) in having fewer lateral line scales, 40-42 vs. more than 60, and in achieving a smaller maximum standard length, less than 15 cm vs. more than 30 cm (Ref. 127217). This species is also distinguished from the smaller-bodied, lower-scale count Distichodus species in the following ways: Distichodus mbiniensis is distinguished from D. decemmaculatus and D. teugelsi in having two rows of teeth on the lower jaw vs. one; it can be readily distinguished from D. noboli, D. hypostomatus and D. maculatus in having fewer scales along the lateral line, 40-42 vs. 45, 53-60 and 75 respectively, and distinguished from D. rufigiensis in not having prominent vertical bars along the sides; it is distinguished from D. kolleri in having fewer dorsal-fin rays, 16-18 total vs. 21-26, and distinguished from D. altus and D. affinis in having fewer total anal-fin rays, 13-14 vs. 21-22 (Ref. 127217). Distichodus mbiniensis is distinguished from D. notospilus in having more scales along the lateral line, 41-42, rarely 40, vs. 37-39, rarely 40, a much less prominent elongated dark spot at the base of the caudal fin, a shorter dorsal fin, 21.4-27.2% of standard length vs. 22.7-34.2%, and shallower caudal peduncle, 11.8-13.0% of standard length vs. 12.3-14.1%; it is distinguished from D. microps in having a deeper body, usually seven scales from lateral line to the pelvic fin vs. six, a subterminal mouth vs. the nearly inferior mouth of D. microps, a shallower, 11.8-13.0% of standard length vs. 12.4-14.2%, and shorter caudal peduncle, 9.7-12.6% of standard length vs. 11.9-14.8%, a larger eye, 58.6-88.0% of snout length vs. 56.7-80.4%, a wider subopercle, and a shallower infraorbital 1 with a more curved anterolateral margin vs. a deeper infraorbital 1 with a more rectangular anterolateral margin in D. microps (Ref. 127217).


Biologie     Glossaire (ex. epibenthic)

Cycle de vie et comportement reproducteur Maturité | Reproduction | Frai | Œufs | Fécondité | Larves

Référence principale Téléchargez vos références | Références | Coordinateur | Collaborateurs

Schmidt, R.C., E.C. Knobloch and C. Barrientos, 2021. Cast netting new species: integrative taxonomy of Distichodus notospilus (Characiformes: Distichodontidae) discovers new species and overlooked areas of endemism in Central Africa. Zootaxa 4952(2):291-313. (Ref. 127217)

Statut dans la liste rouge de l'IUCN (Ref. 130435: Version 2025-2 (Global))

  Vulnérable (VU) (B1ab(iii)); Date assessed: 21 July 2020

CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

Menace pour l'homme

  Harmless





Utilisations par l'homme

FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

Plus d'informations

Écologie trophique
Aliments (proies)
Composition du régime alimentaire
Consommation alimentaire
Rations alimentaires
Prédateurs
Écologie
Écologie
Dynamique des populations
Paramètres de croissance
Âges / tailles maximales
Longueur-poids rel.
Rel. longueur-longueur.
Fréquences de longueurs
Conversion de masse
Recrutement
Abondance
Cycle de vie
Reproduction
Maturité
Maturité/épines rel.
Fécondité
Frai
Agrégats de frai
Œufs
Développement de l'œuf
Larves
Dynamique des populations larvaires
Distribution
Territoires
Zones FAO
Écosystèmes
Occurrences
Introductions
BRUVS - Vidéos
Anatomie
Surface branchiale
Cerveau
Otolithe
Physiologie
Composition corporelle
Nutriments
Consommation d'oxygène
Type de natation
Vitesse de nage
Pigments visuels
Son de poisson
Maladies et parasites
Toxicité (CL50)
Génétique
génôme
Génétique
Hétérozygotie
Héritabilité
Diversité génétique
Liées à l'homme
Systèmes d'aquaculture
Profils d'aquaculture
Souches
Cas de ciguatera
Timbres, pièces de monnaie, divers
Sensibilisation
Collaborateurs
Taxonomie
Noms communs
Synonymes
Morphologie
Morphométrie
Images
Références
Références

Outils

Articles particuliers

Télécharger en XML

Sources Internet

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | Websites from users | FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: Genre, Espèce | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | OneZoom | Open Tree of Life | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | TreeBase | Arbre de Vie | Wikipedia: aller à, chercher | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | Zoological Record

Estimations basées sur des modèles

Indice de diversité phylogénétique
(Réf. 82804)
PD50 = 0.5000 [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Bayesian length-weight a=0.01445 (0.00605 - 0.03454), b=3.05 (2.86 - 3.24), in cm total length, based on LWR estimates for this Genus-body shape (Ref. 93245).
0
Vulnérabilité de la pêche
(Ref. 59153)
Low vulnerability (10 of 100). 🛈