Labeobarbus nzadinkisi

Labeobarbus nzadinkisi Vreven, Musschoot, Decru, Wamuini Lunkayilakio, Obiero, Cerwenka & Schliewen, 2018

Carica il tuo foto e Video
Google image
Image of Labeobarbus nzadinkisi
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Cyprinidae.

Classificazione / Nomi Nomi Comuni | Sinonimi | Catalog of Fishes(Genere, Specie) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

> Cypriniformes (Carps) > Cyprinidae (Minnows or carps) > Torinae
Etymology: nzadinkisi: The current name of the Inkisi River is derived from its local appellation 'Nzadi I nkisi' in Kikongo (Kintandu/Kindibu dialects), referring to the missionaries who threw the 'mi-nkisi', fetish object containing a certain nkisi spirit, in the river in their effort to convert the local populations to Christianity; species name referring to this new name of the river basin to which it appears endemic; in addition, by its reference to the nkisi-objects, indirectly referring to the enigmatic hybridization complex of which this species is a parental species; a noun in apposition, making its gender ending unchangeable (Ref. 127934).

Ambiente: milieu / zona climatica / distribuzione batimetrica / gamma di distribuzione Ecologia

; acqua dolce benthopelagico. Tropical

Distribuzione Territories | Aree FAO | Ecosistemi | Presenze | Mappa dei ritrovamenti | Introduzioni | Faunafri

Africa: Inkisi River, Lower Congo River basin above the Zongo Falls, in Democratic Republic of the Congo (Ref. 127934).

Dimensione / Peso / Età

Maturità: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 20.5 cm SL maschio/sesso non determinato; (Ref. 127934)

Breve descrizione Chiavi di identificazione | Morfologia | Morfometria

Spine dorsali (totale) : 0; Raggi dorsali molli (totale) : 14 - 16; Spine anali: 0; Raggi anali molli: 9; Vertebre: 37 - 38. Diagnosis: Within the Congo basin Labeobarbus nzadinkisi can be distinguished from L. altipinnis, L. ansorgii, L. batesii, L. brauni, L. cardozoi, L. caudovittatus, L. dartevellei, L. fasolt, L. habereri, L. humphri, L. iphthimostoma, L. iturii, L. jubbi, L. longidorsalis, L. longifilis, L. lufupensis, L. macroceps, L. macrolepidotus, L. macrolepis, L. mawambi, L. mawambiensis, L. mirabilis, L. nanningsi, L. oxyrhynchus, L. paucisquamatus, L. stappersii, L. trachypterus, L. upembensis and L. wittei by its high number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. less than 34; from L. leleupanus by its low number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. 45-47; from L. tropidolepis and L. platyrhinus by its low number of scales between the lateral line and the dorsal and ventral midline, 4.5-5.5 and 5.5 vs. 7.5-8.5 and 7.5-9.5 in L. tropidolepis and 6.5-7.5 and 6.5-8.5 in L. platyrhinus, and from the latter by its low number of circumpeduncular scales as well, 12-14 vs. 16-18; from L. robertsi by the absence of papillae on the anterior edge of the lower jaw vs. with numerous well identifiable papillae; from L. progenys by its non-prognathous lower jaw vs. prognathous; from L. altianalis, L. gestetneri and L. somereni by its lack of both pairs of barbels vs. two pair of well-developed barbels; and from L. pellegrini by its short prepelvic length, 46.5-48.5% of standard length vs. 50.6%, its short pelvic length, 17.9-21.0% of standard length vs. 21.8%, and its large eye, 29.1-34.6% of head length vs. 27.1% (Ref. 127934). Further, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from the other members of the Inkisi complex, L. nzadimalawu and the intermediate/hybrid specimens by the presence of a cornified Varicorhinus real cutting edge on the outer edge of the lower jaw in combination with the absence of barbels and poorly developed fleshy lips on the lateral side of the lower jaw vs. never with a cutting edge but instead always with a free mental lobe in combination with two pairs of well-developed barbels and well-developed fleshy lips in L. nzadimalawu; although a cornified Varicorhinus real cutting edge can be found in some specimens, this most often in combination with at leats a single pair of well-developed barbels and well-developed fleshy lips in the hybrid specimens; in addition, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from L. nzadimalawu by its broad mouth width, 26.8-50.5% of head length vs. 16.1-26.5%, short head length, 20.1-22.1% of standard length vs. 23.0-26.4%, long dorsal-fin base length, 14.4-17.9% of standard length vs. 12.1-16.0%, and short prepectoral distance, 20.0-22.1% of standard length vs. 22.6-26.0% (Ref. 127934). Finally, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from Acapoeta tanganicae by its low number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. 57-67 (Ref. 127934). Within the adjacent Lower Guinea ichthyofaunal province, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from L. axelrodi, L. batesii, L. brevispinis, L. cardozoi, L. caudovittatus, L. compiniei, L. habereri, L. fimbriatus, L. jaegeri, L. malacanthus, L. mariae, L. mbami, L. micronema, mungoensis, L. roylii, L. sandersi, L. semireticulatus, L. steindachneri, L. tornieri, L. versluysii and L. werneri by its higher number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. less than 34; from L. aspius, L. lucius and L. progenys by its non-prognathous lower jaw vs. lower jaw clearly prognathous; and from L. rocadasi by its last unbranched dorsal-fin ray not being transformed into a well-developed spine, but instead being clearly segmented over approximately half its length, or 43.0-50.1% of dorsal-fin height vs. last unbranched dorsal-fin ray transformed into a spine, clearly segmented only at its most distal end; finally, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from Sanagia velifera by its high number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. 22-24 (Ref. 127934). Within the adjacent Quanza ichthyofaunal province, L. nzadinkisi can be distinguished from L. ansorgii, L. gulielmi, L. jubbi, L. nanningsi, L. rhinophorus, L. rosae and L. roylii by its high number of lateral line scales, 35-41 vs. less than 34; from L. clarkeae, L. ensifer and L. varicostoma by the absence of papillae on the anterior edge of the lower jaw vs. with well identifiable papillae; from L. lucius and L. progenys by its non-prognathous lower jaw vs. lower jaw clearly prognathous; and from L. boulengeri, L. ensis, L. girardi, L. steindachneri, L. stenostoma and L. rocadasi by its last unbranched dorsal-fin ray not being transformed into a well-developed spine, but instead being clearly segmented over approximately half its length, or 43.0-50.1% of dorsal-fin height vs. last unbranched dorsal-fin ray transformed into a spine, clearly segmented only at its most distal end (Ref. 127934).


Body shape (shape guide): elongated.

Biologia     Glossario (es. epibenthic)

Ciclo vitale e comportamento di accoppiamento Maturità | Riproduzione | Deposizione | Uova | Fecondità | Larve

Riferimento principale Caricare le referenze | Bibliografia | Coordinatore | Collaboratori

Vreven, E.J.W.M.N., T. Musschoot, E. Decru, S. Wamuini Lunkayilakio, K. Obiero, A.F. Cerwenka and U.K. Schliewen, 2018. The complex origins of mouth polymorphism in the Labeobarbus (Cypriniformes: Cyprinidae) of the Inkisi River basin (Lower Congo, DRC, Africa): insights from an integrative approach. Zool. J. Linn. Soc. 186:414-482. (Ref. 127934)

Stato della Lista Rossa IUCN (Ref. 130435: Version 2025-2 (Global))


CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

Minaccia per l'uomo

  Harmless





Usi umani

Pesca: di nessun interesse
FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

Informazioni ulteriori

Ecologia trofica
Articoli alimentari (prede)
Alimentazione
Consumo di cibo
Razioni alimentari
Predatori
Ecologia
Ecologia
Dinamica della popolazione
Parametri di crescita
Età massima / dimensioni massime
Rapporto lunghezza-peso.
Lunghezza-lunghezza rel.
Lunghezza-frequenze
Conversione di massa
Reclutamento
Abbondanza
Ciclo di vita
Riproduzione
Maturità
Maturità/Gli occhielli sono relativi.
Fecondità
Deposizione
Aggregazioni riproduttive
Uova
Sviluppo delle uova
Larve
Dinamica popolazioni larvali
Distribuzione
Territories
Aree FAO
Ecosistemi
Presenze
Introduzioni
BRUVS - Video
Anatomia
Area branchiale
Cervello
Otolite
Fisiologia
Composizione corporea
Nutrienti
Consumo di ossigeno
Tipo di nuoto
Velocità di nuoto
Pigmenti visivi
Suono del pesce
Malattie e parassiti
Tossicità (LC50)
Genetica
Genome
Genetica
Eterozigosi
Ereditarietà
Diversità genetica
Legato all'uomo
Sistemi di acquacoltura
Profili di acquacoltura
Varietà
Casi di Ciguatera
Francobolli, monete, materiale vario.
Raggiungimento
Collaboratori
Tassonomia
Nomi Comuni
Sinonimi
Morfologia
Morfometria
Immagini
Bibliografia
Bibliografia

Strumenti

Rapporti speciali

Scarica XML

Fonti Internet

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | Websites from users | Check FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: Genere, Specie | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | OneZoom | Open Tree of Life | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | TreeBase | Tree of Life | Wikipedia: Go, ricerca | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | Record zoologico

Stime basate su modelli

Indice di diversità filogenetica
(Fonte Biblio. 82804)
PD50 = 0.5000 [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Bayesian length-weight a=0.00468 (0.00220 - 0.00994), b=3.10 (2.90 - 3.30), in cm total length, based on LWR estimates for this (Sub)family-body shape (Ref. 93245).
Livello trofico
(Fonte Biblio. 69278)
3.2   ±0.5 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
Resilienza
(Fonte Biblio. 120179)
Medio, tempo minimo di raddoppiamento della popolazione 1.4 - 4.4 anni (Preliminary K or Fecundity.).
Vulnerabilità della pesca
(Ref. 59153)
Low to moderate vulnerability (33 of 100). 🛈