Hypostomus hermanni

Hypostomus hermanni (Ihering, 1905)

ارفع صور و مقاطع فيديو
 صور قوقل
Image of Hypostomus hermanni
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Loricariidae.

التصنيف / الأسماء الأسماء الشائعة | مرادفات | Catalog of Fishes(جنس, الانواع) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

> Siluriformes (Catfishes) > Loricariidae (Armored catfishes) > Hypostominae
Etymology: Hypostomus: Greek, hypo = under + Greek, stoma = mouth (Ref. 45335).
Eponymy: Hermann von Ihering (1850–1930). (See Ihering, HFA) (Ref. 128868), visit book page.

البيئة: الوسط / المنطقة المناخية / نطاق العمق / نطاق التوزيع البيئة

; المياه العذبة القاع. Tropical

التوزيع الأقاليم | مناطق الفاو | النظام البيئي | الظهور | نقطة علي الخريطة | مقدمة | Faunafri

South America: Brazil.

الحجم / وزن / العمر

النضج: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 24.0 cm TL ذكر/ مختلط الجنس; (Ref. 36817)

وصف مختصر مفاتيح التعريف | الوصف الخارجي | قياسات المظهر الخارجي

This species is distinguished from the species of the super-group H. cochliodon by having viliform teeth and dentaries usually angled more than 100° (vs. spoon- or shovel-shaped teeth and dentary rami angled to each other up to 80°; differs from the species of the super-group H. hemiurus by having round dark blotches (vs. somewhat horizontally elongate dark blotches); differs from the species of the super-group H. plecostomus by lacking rows of odontodes on keels along lateral series of plates (vs. with moderate to well-developed rows of odontodes); differs from H. nematopterusa by lacking elongate dorsal-fin ray (vs. extremely elongate dorsal-fin ray); differs from its congeners of the H. auroguttatus super-group by having dark spots or blotches on a clear background (vs. pale spots or vermiculations on a darker background); differs from asperatus, brevicauda, johnii, leucophaeus, nigropunctatus, uruguayensis by having large dark blotches, similar to or larger than eye diameter on trunk and fins (vs. small spots, similar to or smaller than eye pupil diameter); differs from atropinnis, denticulatus, freirei, goyazensis, iheringii, macrops, latirostris, ternetzi by having parieto-supraoccipital and predorsal region flat (vs. parieto-supraoccipital medially raised and with raised parallel keels on predorsal region); differs from brevis, garmani, goyazensis, lima, topavae ( by having parieto-supraoccipital and predorsal region flat (vs. predorsal region high and convex in frontal view); differs from denticulatus, jaguar, latirostris, mutucae, paulinus, ternetzi by having tooth number less than 46 on each premaxillary or dentary (vs. more than 50); differs from agna, angipinnatus, latifrons, luetkeni by having a single predorsal plate bordering parieto-supraoccipital (vs. two to three plates); differs from perdido by having bicuspid teeth (vs. unicuspid teeth); differs from peckoltoides by having dark large blotches on body and fins (vs. wide dark transverse bars on body and bands on fins); differs from guajupia by having conspicuous blotches or marks on body and fins (vs. lacking conspicuous blotches or marks); differs from heraldo by having pectoral-fin spine length smaller than pelvic-fin unbranched ray (vs. larger than); differs from nigromaculatus by lacking a curved club-shaped pectoral-fin spine (vs. curved club-shaped pectoral-fin spine); differs from wuchereri by having abdomen plated in specimens about 100 mm SL (vs. abdomen mostly naked in specimens up to 150 mm SL); differs from yuka by lacking hypertrophied odontodes on laterals of trunk (vs. mature males with hypertrophied odontods on laterals of trunk); differs from garmani, guajupia by the compressed caudal peduncle, almost triangular shaped, lateral surface of caudal peduncle straight (vs. oval-shaped caudal peduncle, lateral surface of caudal peduncle convex) (Ref. 124595).. differs from species of the super-group H. cochliodon by having large dark is distinguished from the Kner, 1854 by having viliform teeth and dentaries usually angled more than 100° (vs. spoon- or shovel-shaped teeth and dentary rami angled to each other up to 80°; from the species of the super-group H. hemiurus (Eigenmann, 1912) by having round dark blotches (vs. somewhat horizontally elongate dark blotches); from the species of the super-group H. plecostomus (Ihering, 1905) by lacking rows of odontodes on keels along lateral series of plates (vs. with moderate to well-developed rows of odontodes on keels); from H. nematopterus Isbrücker & Nijssen, 1984 by lacking elongate dorsal-fin ray (vs. extremely elongate dorsal-fin ray). From the congeners of the H. auroguttatus Kner, 1854 super-group Hypostomus hermanni is diagnosed from H. alatus Castelnau, 1855, H. albopunctatus (Regan, 1908), H. arecuta Cardoso, Almirón, Casciotta, Aichino, Lizarralde & Montoya-Burgos, 2012, H. faveolus Zawadzki, Birindelli & Lima, 2008, H. fluviatilis (Schubart, 1964), H. francisci (Lütken, 1874), H. krishnamurtii Zawadzki, Penido & Lucinda, 2020, H. luteomaculatus (Devincenzi, 1942), H. luteus (Godoy, 1980), H. margaritifer (Regan, 1908), H. meleagris (Marini, Nichols & LaMonte, 1933), H. microstomus Weber, 1987, H. multidens Jerep, Shibatta & Zawadzki, 2007, H. regani (Ihering, 1905), H. roseopunctatus Reis, Weber & Malabarba, 1990, H. strigaticeps (Regan, 1908), H. tietensis (Ihering, 1905) and H. variipictus (Ihering, 1911) by having dark spots or blotches on a clear background (vs. pale spots or vermiculations on a darker background); from H. asperatus Castelnau, 1855, H. brevicauda (Günther, 1864), H. johnii (Steindachner, 1877), H. leucophaeus Zanata & Pitanga, 2016, H. nigropunctatus Garavello, Britski & Zawadzki, 2012, H. renestoi Zawadzki, da Silva & Troy, 2018 and H. uruguayensis Reis, Weber & Malabarba, 1990 by having large dark is distinguished from the species of the supergroup H. cochliodon Kner, 1854 by having viliform teeth and dentaries usually angled more than 100° (vs. spoon- or shovel-shaped teeth and dentary rami angled to each other up to 80°; from the species of the super-group H. hemiurus (Eigenmann, 1912) by having round dark blotches (vs. somewhat horizontally elongate dark blotches); from the species of the super-group H. plecostomus (Ihering, 1905) by lacking rows of odontodes on keels along lateral series of plates (vs. with moderate to well-developed rows of odontodes on keels); from H. nematopterus Isbrücker & Nijssen, 1984 by lacking elongate dorsal-fin ray (vs. extremely elongate dorsal-fin ray). From the congeners of the H. auroguttatus Kner, 1854 super-group Hypostomus hermanni is diagnosed from H. alatus Castelnau, 1855, H. albopunctatus (Regan, 1908), H. arecuta Cardoso, Almirón, Casciotta, Aichino, Lizarralde & Montoya-Burgos, 2012, H. faveolus Zawadzki, Birindelli & Lima, 2008, H. fluviatilis (Schubart, 1964), H. francisci (Lütken, 1874), H. krishnamurtii Zawadzki, Penido & Lucinda, 2020, H. luteomaculatus (Devincenzi, 1942), H. luteus (Godoy, 1980), H. margaritifer (Regan, 1908), H. meleagris (Marini, Nichols & LaMonte, 1933), H. microstomus Weber, 1987, H. multidens Jerep, Shibatta & Zawadzki, 2007, H. regani (Ihering, 1905), H. roseopunctatus Reis, Weber & Malabarba, 1990, H. strigaticeps (Regan, 1908), H. tietensis (Ihering, 1905) and H. variipictus (Ihering, 1911) by having dark spots or blotches on a clear background (vs. pale spots or vermiculations on a darker background); from H. asperatus Castelnau, 1855, H. brevicauda (Günther, 1864), H. johnii (Steindachner, 1877), H. leucophaeus Zanata & Pitanga, 2016, H. nigropunctatus Garavello, Britski & Zawadzki, 2012, H. renestoi Zawadzki, da Silva & Troy, 2018 and H. uruguayensis Reis, Weber & Malabarba, 1990 by having large dark blotches, that is, similar to or larger than eye diameter on trunk and fins (vs. small spots, similar to or smaller than eye pupil diameter); from H. atropinnis (Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1890), H. denticulatus Zawadzki, Weber & Pavanelli, 2008, H. freirei Penido, Pessali & Zawadzki, 2021, H. goyazensis (Regan, 1908), H. iheringii (Regan, 1908), H. macrops (Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1890), H. latirostris (Regan, 1904) and H. ternetzi (Boulenger, 1895) by having parieto-supraoccipital and predorsal region flat (vs. parieto-supraoccipital medially raised and with raised parallel keels on predorsal region); from H. brevis (Nichols, 1919), H. garmani (Regan, 1904), H. goyazensis (Regan, 1908), H. lima (Lütken, 1874) and H. topavae (Godoy, 1969) by having parieto-supraoccipital and predorsal region flat (vs. predorsal region high and convex in frontal view); from H. denticulatus, H. jaguar Zanata, Sardeiro & Zawadzki, 2013, H. latirostris, H. mutucae Knaack, 1999, H. paulinus (Ihering, 1905) and H. ternetzi by having tooth number less than 46 on each premaxillary or dentary (vs. more than 50); from H. agna (Miranda Ribeiro, 1907), H. angipinnatus (Leege, 1922), H. isbrueckeri Reis, Weber & Malabarba, 1990, H. latifrons Weber, 1986, H. luetkeni (Steindachner, 1877) and by having a single predorsal plate bordering parieto-supraoccipital (vs. two to three plates); from and H. perdido Zawadzki, Tencatt & Froehlich, 2014 by having bicuspid teeth (vs. unicuspid teeth); from H. peckoltoides Zawadzki, Weber & Pavanelli, 2010 by having dark large blotches on body and fins (vs. wide dark transverse bars on body and bands on fins); from H. guajupia Penido, Pessali & Zawadzki, 2021 by having conspicuous blotches or marks on body and fins (vs. lacking conspicuous blotches or marks); from H. heraldoi Zawadzki, Weber & Pavanelli, 2008 by having pectoral-fin spine length smaller than pelvic-fin unbranched ray (vs. larger than); from H. nigromaculatus (Schubart, 1964) by lacking curved club-shaped pectoral-fin spine (vs. curved club-shaped pectoral-fin spine); H. wuchereri (Günther, 1864) by having abdomen plated in specimens about 100 mm SL (vs. abdomen mostly naked in specimens up to 150 mm SL); from H. yaku Martins, Langeani & Zawadzki, 2014 by lacking hypertrophied odontodes on laterals of trunk (vs. mature males with hypertrophied odontods on laterals of trunk) and from H. garmani and H. guajupia by compressed caudal peduncle, almost triangular shaped, lateral surface of caudal peduncle straight (vs. oval-shaped caudal peduncle, lateral surface of caudal peduncle convex) (Ref. 124595).
Body shape (shape guide): elongated; Cross section: oval.

أحياء     المصطلحات (على سبيل المثال epibenthic)

Facultative air-breathing in the genus (Ref. 126274); Usually found in shallow to moderately shallow running waters (Ref. 124595).

دورة الحياة وسلوك التزاوج النضج | التكاثر | وضع البيض | بيض | الخصوبة | اليرقات

المرجع الرئيسي قم بتحميل مراجعك | مراجع | المنظم : Fisch-Muller, Sonia | المتعاونين

Dias, A.C. and C.H. Zawadzki, 2021. Hypostomus hermanni redescription and a new species of Hypostomus (Siluriformes: Loricariidae) from Upper Paraná River basin, Brazil. Neotrop. Ichthyol. 19(2). (Ref. 124595)

حالة القائمة الحمراء للاتحاد الدولي لحفظ الطبيعة والموارد الطبيعية (Ref. 130435: Version 2025-2 (Global))

  Least Concern (LC) ; Date assessed: 07 November 2018

CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

خطر للأنسان

  Harmless





استخدامات بشرية

مصائد: غير ذات اهمية
FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

مزيد من المعلومات

علم البيئة الغذائية
المواد الغذائية (الفرائس)
التركيبة الغذائية
استهلاك الأغذية
الحصص الغذائية
مفتريسات
البيئة
البيئة
الديناميكيات السكانية
معاملات النمو
الحد الأقصى للأعمار/الأحجام
علاقة الطول بالوزن.
علاقة الطول بالطول.
الطول- الترددات
التحويل الجماعي
توظيف
الوفرة
دورة الحياة
التكاثر
النضج
النضج/الخياشيم المتعلقة.
الخصوبة
وضع البيض
تجمعات التفريخ
بيض
تطور البيضة
اليرقات
حركة انتقال اليرقات
التوزيع
الأقاليم
مناطق الفاو
النظام البيئي
الظهور
مقدمة
بروفس - فيديوهات
التشريح
منطقة الخياشيم
الدماغ
الأوتوليث
علم وظائف الأعضاء
تكوين الجسم
المغذيات
استهلاك الأوكسجين
نوع السباحة
سرعة السباحة
الأصباغ البصرية
صوت السمك
الأمراض والطفيليات
السمية (LC50s)
جيني
الوراثة
جيني
التغاير
التوريث
التنوع الوراثي
ذات الصلة بالبشر
أنظمة الاستزراع المائي
ملامح تربية الأحياء المائية
سلالات
حالات سيغواتيرا
طوابع بريدية وعملات معدنية ومتنوعة
التوعية
المتعاونين
التصنيف
الأسماء الشائعة
مرادفات
الوصف الخارجي
قياسات المظهر الخارجي
صور
مراجع
مراجع

أدوات

كتاب إلكتروني | دليل الميدان | معالج تردد الطول-التردد | أداة تاريخ الحياة | نقطة علي الخريطة | Catch-MSY |

تقارير خاصة

البحث عن صيانت الأحواض المائيه | التحقق من وجود صفحات حقائق الأنواع | البحث عنا حقائق حول الأحواض المائيه

تنزيل XML

صفحة الملخص | نقطة بيانات | الأسماء الشائعة | صور

مصادر علي الأنترنت

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | Websites from users | البحث في مراقبي الأسماك | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: جنس, الانواع | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | OneZoom | Open Tree of Life | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | TreeBase | شجرة الحياة | Wikipedia: ذهب, بحث | World Records Freshwater Fishing | سجلات علم الحيوانات

تقديرات تستند إلى النماذج

مؤشر التنوع الشُعبي الوراثي
(مرجع 82804) 		PD50 = 0.5000 [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Bayesian length-weight a=0.01585 (0.00733 - 0.03429), b=2.95 (2.78 - 3.12), in cm total length, based on LWR estimates for this Genus-body shape (Ref. 93245).
0
المرونه
(مرجع 120179) 		وسيط, الحد الزمني الأدني لتضاعف عدد أفراد المجتمع 1.4-4.4 سنة (Fec= 132).
ضعف الصيد
(Ref. 59153) 		Low to moderate vulnerability (35 of 100). 🛈