Rhamdella zelimai

Rhamdella zelimai Reis, Malabarba & Lucena, 2014

上傳你的 相片 和 影像
Google 影像
Image of Rhamdella zelimai
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Heptapteridae.

分類 / 名稱 俗名 | 同種異名 | Catalog of Fishes(, ) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

Teleostei > Siluriformes (Catfishes) 鯰形目 (Catfishes) > Heptapteridae (Three-barbeled catfishes) 七鰭鯰科 (Three-barbeled catfishes)
Etymology: Rhamdella: Brazilian vernacular name, Nhamdia/Jamdia (Ref. 45335)zelimai: Named for José Lima de Figueiredo (nick name Zé Lima).
Eponymy: Dr José Lima de Figueiredo aka ‘Ze Lima’ is a Brazilian ichthyologist who is a former researcher and Curator of Fishes at the Zoological Museum of the University of São Paulo. [...] (Ref. 128868), visit book page.

環境: 環境 / 氣候帶 / 深度上下限 / 配送範圍 生態學

; 淡水 居於水底的.

分布 領土 | FAO區域 | 生態系 | 發現紀錄 | 分布圖 | 簡介 | Faunafri

South America: coastal river drainages in northeastern Rio Grande do Sul and southern Santa Catarina States, Brazil.

大小 / 重量 / 年齡

成熟度: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 13.6 cm SL 雄魚/尚未辨別雌雄; (Ref. 98446)

簡短描述 檢索表 | 型態特徵 | 形態測量圖

背的軟條 (總數) : 7; 脊椎骨: 43 - 44. Rhamdella zelimai is distinguished from all its congeners by the hypertrophy of the rictal fold, mainly its lower portion consisting of a large and fleshy lobe whose posterior limit reaches the level of the transverse line through the preoperculomandibular sensory pore 5 and almost reaches the transverse plane through the base of the mental barbels (vs. lower portion of the rictal fold not hypertrophied). It can be further diagnosed from R. aymarae and R. rusbyi by having a shorter maxillary barbel in adults (barbel tip reaching from just anterior to just posterior the base of the pectoral-fin ray vs. tip falling short or reaching to vertical through dorsal-fin origin in R. aymarae or reaching to or passing the vertical through the posterior end of the dorsal-fin base in R. rusbyi); seven branchiostegal rays (vs. six); and inteorbital width 14.7?19.5% HL (vs. 31.0?44.9% in R. aymarae and 26.5?27.1% in R. rusbyi). It is further distinguished from R. aymarae by its larger horizontal eye diameter (18.8?24.4% of HL vs. 11.5?17.3%), shorter interdorsal length (10.0?12.6% SL vs. 16.9?23.4%), and longer adipose-fin base (32.2?36.0% SL vs. 18.5?27.9%); and from R. rusbyi, by its shorter pelvic fin (15.3?16.9% SL vs. 17.0?19.1%), longer anal-fin base (14.9?18.5% SL vs. 11.8?14.0%), the dorsal and ventral caudal-fin lobes subequal in both sexes (vs. dorsal caudal-fin lobe longer than the ventral lobe); and a distinct narrow dark mid lateral stripe (vs. stripe absent). Rhamdella zelimai can be further differentiated from R. eriarcha by its premaxilla broader laterally, making the anterior margin of both premaxillae an almost straight line (vs. premaxilla homogeneously broad from mesial to lateral ends, so that the anterior margin of both premaxillae draw a gentle curve). It further differs from R. cainguae by the following characters: absence of the 'frontalsphenotic space' a distinct and large ovoid area in the supraorbital laterosensory canal between the frontal and sphenotic delimited by the apparently slender dorsal walls of these bones (vs. presence); by its larger interdorsal length (10.0?12.6% SL, mean = 11.1% vs. 7.6?10.3%, mean = 8.9%); shorter adipose-fin base (32.2?36.0% SL vs. 37.5?41.6%); shorter dorsal-fin base (11.2%?13.5% SL, mean = 12.4% vs. 13.3?16.5%, mean = 14.5%); shorter anal-fin base (14.9?18.5% SL vs. 18.6?22.0%); large internarial length (14.2%?16.6% HL vs. 21.6?24.7%); smaller internarial width (14.0?17.3% HL vs. 19.4?21.4%). It is also distinguished from R. longiuscula, by the dorsal and ventral caudal-fin lobes subequal in both sexes (vs. dorsal caudal-fin lobe longer than ventral lobe, mainly in males); and longer predorsal length (36.2?40.8% SL, mean = 38.0% vs. 31.6?37.0%, mean = 34.5%); from R. cainguae and R. aymarae by the absence of a dense concentration of long and slender papillae on the lateral body surface in the pectoral and abdominal regions (vs. presence of such papillae, resulting in a hairy aspect) (Ref. 98446).
Body shape (shape guide): elongated.

生物學特性     字彙 (例如 epibenthic)

Inhabits small to medium-sized streams with clear water running on a bottom composed of boulders, stones and gravel (Ref. 98446).

生命週期和交配行為 成熟度 | 繁殖 | 產卵場 | | 孕卵數 | 仔魚


主要參考資料 上傳您的推薦信 | 參考文獻 | 合作者 : Bockmann, Flavio | 合作者

Reis, R.E., L.R. Malabarba and C.A.S. de Lucena, 2014. A new species of Rhamdella Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1888 (Siluriformes: Heptateridae) from the coastal basins of southern Brazil. Arquivos de Zoologia 45:41-50. (Ref. 98446)

IUCN 瀕危狀態 (Ref. 130435: Version 2025-2 (Global))


CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

對人類具威脅

 





人類使用

FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

更多資訊

營養生態學
食物項目(獵物)
食性組成
食物消耗量
食物配給
捕食者
生態學
生態學
人口動態
成長參數
最大年齡/尺寸
長度重量比
長度關係
長度-頻率
質量轉換
入添量
豐度
生命週期
繁殖
成熟度
成熟度/鰓部相對
孕卵數
產卵場
產卵聚集

卵發育
仔魚
稚魚動力學
分布
領土
FAO區域
生態系
發現紀錄
簡介
BRUVS - 影片
解剖學
鰓區
腦部
耳石
生理學
身體成分
營養素
耗氧量
游泳類型
游泳速度
視覺色素
魚聲
疾病與寄生蟲
毒性 (LC50s)
遺傳學
基因組
遺傳學
異種性
遺傳率
遺傳多樣性
人類相關
水產養殖系統
水產養殖描述
品種
雪卡毒病例
郵票、錢幣、雜項
外展服務
合作者
分類學
俗名
同種異名
型態特徵
形態測量圖
照片
參考文獻
參考文獻

工具

特別的報告

下載 XML

網路資源

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | Websites from users | 檢查 FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: , | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | OneZoom | Open Tree of Life | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | TreeBase | 樹狀分類階層 | Wikipedia: , 搜尋 | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | 動物學的記錄

基於模型的估計

系統發育多樣性指數
(參考文獻 82804)
PD50 = 0.5020 [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Bayesian length-weight a=0.00813 (0.00374 - 0.01767), b=2.97 (2.79 - 3.15), in cm total length, based on LWR estimates for this (Sub)family-body shape (Ref. 93245).
營養階層
(參考文獻 69278)
3.5   ±0.4 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
回復力
(參考文獻 120179)
中等的, 族群倍增時間最少 1.4 - 4.4年 (Preliminary K or Fecundity.).
釣魚的脆弱性
(Ref. 59153)
Moderate vulnerability (43 of 100). 🛈