Rhamdella zelimai

Rhamdella zelimai Reis, Malabarba & Lucena, 2014

アップロード 写真 そして ビデオ
グーグルの画像
Image of Rhamdella zelimai
No image available for this species;
drawing shows typical species in Heptapteridae.

分類 / 名前 共通名の | 類義語 | Catalog of Fishes(部類, ) | ITIS | CoL | WoRMS | Cloffa

> Siluriformes (Catfishes) > Heptapteridae (Three-barbeled catfishes)
Etymology: Rhamdella: Brazilian vernacular name, Nhamdia/Jamdia (Ref. 45335)zelimai: Named for José Lima de Figueiredo (nick name Zé Lima).
Eponymy: Dr José Lima de Figueiredo aka ‘Ze Lima’ is a Brazilian ichthyologist who is a former researcher and Curator of Fishes at the Zoological Museum of the University of São Paulo. [...] (Ref. 128868), visit book page.

環境:環境 / 気候帯 / 深さの範囲 / 分布範囲 生態学

; 新鮮な水 底生の. Tropical

分布 領土 | 国連食糧農業機関の区域 | エコシステム | 事件 | 目的のマップ | 導入 | Faunafri

South America: coastal river drainages in northeastern Rio Grande do Sul and southern Santa Catarina States, Brazil.

サイズ / 重さ / 年齢

成熟: Lm ?  range ? - ? cm
Max length : 13.6 cm SL オス/雌雄の選別がない; (Ref. 98446)

簡単な記述 検索表 | 形態学 | 形態計測学

背鰭 (合計) : 7; 脊つい: 43 - 44. Rhamdella zelimai is distinguished from all its congeners by the hypertrophy of the rictal fold, mainly its lower portion consisting of a large and fleshy lobe whose posterior limit reaches the level of the transverse line through the preoperculomandibular sensory pore 5 and almost reaches the transverse plane through the base of the mental barbels (vs. lower portion of the rictal fold not hypertrophied). It can be further diagnosed from R. aymarae and R. rusbyi by having a shorter maxillary barbel in adults (barbel tip reaching from just anterior to just posterior the base of the pectoral-fin ray vs. tip falling short or reaching to vertical through dorsal-fin origin in R. aymarae or reaching to or passing the vertical through the posterior end of the dorsal-fin base in R. rusbyi); seven branchiostegal rays (vs. six); and inteorbital width 14.7?19.5% HL (vs. 31.0?44.9% in R. aymarae and 26.5?27.1% in R. rusbyi). It is further distinguished from R. aymarae by its larger horizontal eye diameter (18.8?24.4% of HL vs. 11.5?17.3%), shorter interdorsal length (10.0?12.6% SL vs. 16.9?23.4%), and longer adipose-fin base (32.2?36.0% SL vs. 18.5?27.9%); and from R. rusbyi, by its shorter pelvic fin (15.3?16.9% SL vs. 17.0?19.1%), longer anal-fin base (14.9?18.5% SL vs. 11.8?14.0%), the dorsal and ventral caudal-fin lobes subequal in both sexes (vs. dorsal caudal-fin lobe longer than the ventral lobe); and a distinct narrow dark mid lateral stripe (vs. stripe absent). Rhamdella zelimai can be further differentiated from R. eriarcha by its premaxilla broader laterally, making the anterior margin of both premaxillae an almost straight line (vs. premaxilla homogeneously broad from mesial to lateral ends, so that the anterior margin of both premaxillae draw a gentle curve). It further differs from R. cainguae by the following characters: absence of the 'frontalsphenotic space' a distinct and large ovoid area in the supraorbital laterosensory canal between the frontal and sphenotic delimited by the apparently slender dorsal walls of these bones (vs. presence); by its larger interdorsal length (10.0?12.6% SL, mean = 11.1% vs. 7.6?10.3%, mean = 8.9%); shorter adipose-fin base (32.2?36.0% SL vs. 37.5?41.6%); shorter dorsal-fin base (11.2%?13.5% SL, mean = 12.4% vs. 13.3?16.5%, mean = 14.5%); shorter anal-fin base (14.9?18.5% SL vs. 18.6?22.0%); large internarial length (14.2%?16.6% HL vs. 21.6?24.7%); smaller internarial width (14.0?17.3% HL vs. 19.4?21.4%). It is also distinguished from R. longiuscula, by the dorsal and ventral caudal-fin lobes subequal in both sexes (vs. dorsal caudal-fin lobe longer than ventral lobe, mainly in males); and longer predorsal length (36.2?40.8% SL, mean = 38.0% vs. 31.6?37.0%, mean = 34.5%); from R. cainguae and R. aymarae by the absence of a dense concentration of long and slender papillae on the lateral body surface in the pectoral and abdominal regions (vs. presence of such papillae, resulting in a hairy aspect) (Ref. 98446).
Body shape (shape guide): elongated.

生物学     用語集 (例 epibenthic)

Inhabits small to medium-sized streams with clear water running on a bottom composed of boulders, stones and gravel (Ref. 98446).

ライフサイクルと交尾行動 成熟 | 繁殖 | 放精 | | 生産力 | 幼生

主な参考文献 参考文献のアップロード | 参考文献 | コーディネーター : Bockmann, Flavio | 協力者

Reis, R.E., L.R. Malabarba and C.A.S. de Lucena, 2014. A new species of Rhamdella Eigenmann & Eigenmann, 1888 (Siluriformes: Heptateridae) from the coastal basins of southern Brazil. Arquivos de Zoologia 45:41-50. (Ref. 98446)

IUCNのレッドリストの状況は (Ref. 130435: Version 2025-2 (Global))


CITES

Not Evaluated

CMS (Ref. 116361)

Not Evaluated

人間に対する脅威

  Harmless





人間の用途

FAO - Publication: search | FishSource |

より多くの情報

養殖生態
食料品(獲物)
餌の構成
摂食量
食料配給
捕食動物
生態学
生態学
人口動態
成長のパラメーター
最大年齢/サイズ
長さ-重量比。
長短関係。
体長組成
質量変換
補充
豊度
ライフサイクル
繁殖
成熟
成熟度/エラ
生産力
放精
産卵群

卵の開発
幼生
幼生の動力
解剖学
カマ

オトリス
生理学
体組成
栄養素
酸素消費
水泳タイプ
泳ぐ速さ
視覚色素
フィッシュ・サウンド
病気と寄生虫
毒性(LC50)
遺伝子の
ゲノム
遺伝子の
ヘテロ接合性
遺伝
遺伝的多様性
人間関係
養殖システム
水産養殖の紹介
緊張
シガテラ症例
切手、コイン、その他
アウトリーチ
協力者
分類学
共通名の
類義語
形態学
形態計測学
画像
参考文献
参考文献

用具

特記事項

XMLをダウンロードして下さい

インターネットの情報源

AFORO (otoliths) | Aquatic Commons | BHL | Cloffa | Websites from users | Check FishWatcher | CISTI | Catalog of Fishes: 部類, | DiscoverLife | ECOTOX | FAO - Publication: search | Faunafri | Fishipedia | Fishtrace | GloBI | Google Books | Google Scholar | Google | IGFA World Record | OneZoom | Open Tree of Life | Otolith Atlas of Taiwan Fishes | PubMed | Reef Life Survey | Socotra Atlas | TreeBase | 生命の木 | Wikipedia: 行く, 検索する | World Records Freshwater Fishing | Zoobank | 動物に関する記録

モデルに基づく推定値

系統多様性指数
(参照 82804)
PD50 = 0.5020 [Uniqueness, from 0.5 = low to 2.0 = high].
Bayesian length-weight a=0.00813 (0.00374 - 0.01767), b=2.97 (2.79 - 3.15), in cm total length, based on LWR estimates for this (Sub)family-body shape (Ref. 93245).
栄養段階
(参照 69278)
3.5   ±0.4 se; based on size and trophs of closest relatives
回復力
(参照 120179)
手段, 1.4年~4.4年の倍増期間の最小個体群 (Preliminary K or Fecundity.).
漁業の脆弱性
(Ref. 59153)
Moderate vulnerability (43 of 100). 🛈